cheap nba jerseys usa
“The crux of the letter is the NFL’s complaint that the connections identified by the Article between the NFL and the tobacco industry were not ‘meaningful,'” McCraw writes. “Obviously, that is an opinion, not a fact.”McCraw also claims that the NFL’s complaint “confirms the overarching point” of the Times article that the league’s concussion research was flawed and incomplete and says “the letter bizarrely quibbles not over whether the research was valid (we all agree that it was not) or whether the NFL defended the research for years (we all agree that it did), but whether the NFL continued to ‘stand by’ the research.” The real burn comes at the end of McCraw’s three page rebuttal when he notes that the NFL’s own law firm represented tobacco giant Philip Morris when it was charged with violating the Racketeer Influenced and cheap authentic jerseys Corrupt Organizations Act. “While your earlier letter to The Times called the tobacco industry ‘perhaps most odious industry in America history,’ you somehow fail to mention in either letter that it was your firm that represented Philip Morris in that RICO case,” McCraw wrote.
basketball nba gear store
The NFL has been pushing back on the Times’ story since its publication last week. It’s written two letters to the Times and even paid for advertisements on the Times website.